“Supporting and enhancing scientific rigor.”
by Guilad Chen
Journal of Applied Psychology, 103 (4), 359-361.
Journal of Applied Psychology
If you want to share an interesting and relevant article with the community,
“Train PhD students to be thinkers not just specialists”
by Gundula Bosch
Nature 554, 277 (2018)
Nature
“Defining and operationalizing theory”
by Jose M. Cortina
Journal of Organizational Behavior, Volume37, Issue8, November 2016, 1142-1149
Journal of Organizational Behavior
“How scientists fool themselves – and how they can stop”
by Regina Nuzzo
Nature 526, 182–185 ()
Nature
“Bridging the Research–Practice Gap”
by Pratima Bansal, Stephanie Bertels, Tom Ewart, Peter MacConnachie and James O’Brien
Acad Manage Perspect February 1, 2012 vol. 26 no. 1 73-92
Academy of Managent Perspectives
“Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship”
by Peter J Buckley, Jonathan P Doh & Mirko H Benischke
J Int Bus Stud (2017) 48: 1045.
Journal of International Business Studies
“Editorial: Researchers and the stakeholder’s perspective”
by Robert M. Davison
Info Systems J (2018) 28, 1–5
Information Systems Journal
“When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings”
by Nancy J Adler & Anne-Wil Harzing
Academy of Management Learning & Education, March 1, 2009 vol. 8 no. 1 72-95
Academy of Management Learning & Education
The Management and Organization Science Puzzle: Questions from a Metaphorical Comparison of Medicine and Management
by Fabrice Cavarretta & Nathan Furr
National Science Foundation, SBE 2020 White Paper
National Science Foundation
Nature
“What You See Is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research”
Academy of Management Annals
“Impact Factor Distortions”
by Bruce Alberts
Science 17 May 2013, Vol. 340, Issue 6134, pp. 787
This editorial coincides with the release of the San Francisco declaration on research Assessment (DORA) initiated by the American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB).
It is about the fallacy of equality journal quality with the quality of the individual articles within the journal. Impact Factor is for assessment journals, not individual articles within the journal.
Science