“What You See Is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research”

by Herman Aguinis, Ravi S. Ramani and Nawaf Alabduljader
Academy of Management Annals

Larry Fink’s letter to CEOs is about more than “social initiatives”

by Judith Samuelson

January 18, 2018

Read here

Quartz at Work

“Calling for Responsible Research”

by Sharon Shinn

January 4, 2018

Read here

Biz Ed

Un Sustainable Development Goals : 17 Goals to Transform our World

Read more

Un Sustainable Development Goals

“Measuring and Achieving Scholarly Impact : a Report from the Academy of Management’s Practice Theme Committee”

by Usha C.V. Haley et al.

Academy of Management Scholarly Impact Report

Read here

AOM Report

“University presidents: We’ve been blindsided”

by Benjamin Wermund

December 19, 2017

Read here

Politico

As Faculty Director of the Ray C. Anderson Center for Sustainable Business, I will run the Center in a way that connects not only my GT colleagues but also the broader Operations Management community to meaningful industry and NGO partnership opportunities, and will focus more resources on research translation/implementation.

view profile

Beril Toktay

I am happy to endorse the intent and thrust of this call to action. Surely the current trends are not sustainable, but reversing them will require systemic change and we as yet do not have the mechanisms in place. The call for multidisciplinary collaboration is especially laudable. Research with impact has to have the ambition and resources appropriate to the size of the problem, and that usually requires a team that can work over multiple years. Our current system of fragmented, individualistic research projects looking for quick results within a single disciplinary silo is an impediment. I will continue to work to encourage school-based research centers to be more ambitious in their choice of problems and resource commitments.

view profile

George Day

Do more responsible research myself and encourage others to do the same, and make this a focal point in IACMR business meeting 2017.

view profile

Neng Liang

1. Focus promotion evaluation on impact rather than on quantity of output only.

2. Strive as a referee/editor to acknowledge and promote results that are not always statistically significant to minimize the incentive of data mining.

3. Focus evaluation on connection between theory and practice.

4. Promote and publicize knowledge in common media.

view profile

Marcin Kacperczyk