The RRBM course was truly a unique and rewarding experience. First, the world-class mentors and presenters not only share their wisdom and insights, but also encourage the students to challenge their assumptions, think critically, and engage in rigorous debates on important topics in social science and practice. Second, a culturally diverse and multi-disciplinary cohort of doctoral students from across the world offer learning and networking opportunities unlikely available anywhere else. Third, a deep dive into the philosophy of science and principles of responsible research provides the foundation to address current issues in the social sciences and society. The course is hard work, but the rewards are commensurate with the efforts required.

Justin, United States, 2021 cohort

I must say that I had high expectations of this course and these expectations were remarkably exceeded. In fact, I think I was able to get the most out of this course and I am ready to use it in the course of my PhD.

This experience would only have been better if it had been face-to-face, as it is really hard to develop solid relationships online.

Furthermore, your teaching styles and methods will serve as a “role model” during my professional and academic life. The extremely well organized way you presented all the contents and lectures (starting with the syllabus and ending with each of the session closings, including the last one) is impressive.

I am a little exhausted after so much reading and discussions, but really happy to have completed it. Although this was a course, it definitely felt like a full first year of a PhD!

Pedro, Portugal, 2021 cohort

Have you ever wondered what it really means when a threshold of p < .10 versus a p < .05 is used for significance hypothesis testing? (Hint: It’s related to the risks involved as organizations implement management practices. It’s not about whether the effect is “more/less significant” nor whether reviewers would find the results “more/less credible.”)

Have you ever wondered why some people will argue that our research should be value-free, while considering organizational values for performance and profit-making as acceptable (and oftentimes taken-for-granted)? Have you also wondered to what extent researchers’ own values (e.g., values for achievement, status, or societal welfare) have played a role in their scientific work?

Have you ever wondered if there is a parallel between translating physics knowledge to engineering practices, biochemical knowledge to medical practices, and management knowledge from your own studies to managerial practices?

If you find any of the above questions intriguing, you will find the course delightful, just as I did. I did not find definitive answers on all the topics, but the interactive discussions and the relevant readings, helped me expand my perspectives to think through these complex issues.

Perhaps these issues do not seem apparent in our day-to-day research. Yet, through the learning in this course, I have come to realize how deeply embedded these issues are in many of our research decisions. Just because we are not always conscious of the implications and influences of our decisions and actions, the impact nevertheless exists. I appreciate the opportunity and the safe space in which I could learn to be more mindful of what we really do as social scientists.

Of course, it was also a lot of fun to make friends with a bunch of inspiring and friendly faculty and peers from around the world!

Grace, United States, 2021 cohort

“The SAGE Handbook of Responsible Management Learning and Education”

Edited by Dirk C. Moosmayer, Oliver Laasch, Carole Parkes & Kenneth G. Brown
Including “Chapter 29: Responsible Research in Business and Management: Transforming Doctoral Education” by Peter McKiernan & Anne S. Tsui
August 2020
Sage Publishing

“How to do Relevant Research – From the Ivory Tower to the Real World”

by Philip H. Mirvis, Susan Albers Mohrman and Christopher G. Worley

2021

Read here

Edward Elgar Publishing

“The Metrics of Ethics and the Ethics of Metrics”

by Gazi Islam & Michelle Greenwood

November 25, 2021

Read here

Journal of Business Ethics

“Business Ethics and Quantification: Towards an Ethics of Numbers”

by Gazi Islam

January 4, 2021

Read here

Journal of Business Ethics

“What’s Wrong With Business Schools Today”

by Sharon Shinn

Febrary 14, 2022

Read here

AACSB Insights

“From Traditional Research to Responsible Research: The Necessity of Scientific Freedom and Scientific Responsibility for Better Societies”

by Anne S Tsui

January, 2022

Read here

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

“A typology of university research park strategies: What parks do and why it matters”

Ian P. McCarthy, Bruno S. Silvestre, Andrew von Nordenflycht & Shiri M. Breznitz

February 3, 2018

Read here

Journal of Engineering and Technology Management